Life cycle assessment of Bitcoin mining in the top ten miner countries
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Singh RL. Global environmental problems. In: Principles and Applications of Environmental Biotechnology for a Sustainable Future. Springer; 2017. pp. 13–41.
Braig P, Edinger-Schons LM. From purpose to impact—An investigation of the application of impact measurement and valuation methods for quantifying environmental and social impacts of businesses. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2020; 23: 189–197.
Daneshgar S, Zahedi R. Investigating the hydropower plants production and profitability using system dynamics approach. Journal of Energy Storage 2022; 46: 103919. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103919
Howson P, de Vries A. Preying on the poor? Opportunities and challenges for tackling the social and environmental threats of cryptocurrencies for vulnerable and low-income communities. Energy Research & Social Science 2022; 84: 102394. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102394
Fadeyi O, Krejcar O, Maresova P, et al. Opinions on sustainability of smart cities in the context of energy challenges posed by cryptocurrency mining. Sustainability 2019; 12(1): 169. doi: 10.3390/su12010169
de Vries A. Bitcoin’s growing energy problem. Joule 2018; 2(5): 801–805. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.016
Goodkind AL, Jones BA, Berrens RP. Cryptodamages: Monetary value estimates of the air pollution and human health impacts of cryptocurrency mining. Energy Research & Social Science 2020; 59: 101281. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101281
Köhler S, Pizzol M. Life cycle assessment of bitcoin mining. Environmental Science & Technology 2019; 53(23): 13598–13606. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05687
Jiang S, Li Y, Lu Q, et al. Policy assessments for the carbon emission flows and sustainability of Bitcoin blockchain operation in China. Nature Communications 2021; 12(1): 1938. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22256-3
Zahedi R, Ayazi M, Aslani A. Comparison of amine adsorbents and strong hydroxides soluble for direct air CO2 capture by life cycle assessment method. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2022; 28: 102854. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102854
Maghzian A, Aslani A, Zahedi R. Review on the direct air CO2 capture by microalgae: Bibliographic mapping. Energy Reports 2022; 8: 3337–3349. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.125
Kumar S. Review of geothermal energy as an alternate energy source for Bitcoin mining. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research 2021; 23(1): 1–12.
Mora C, Rollins RL, Taladay K, et al. Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2 ℃. Nature Climate Change 2018; 8(11): 931–933. doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0321-8
Gurdgiev C, O’Loughlin D. Herding and anchoring in cryptocurrency markets: Investor reaction to fear and uncertainty. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 2020; 25: 100271. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100271
de Vries A, Gallersdo¨rfer U, Klaaßen L, Stoll C. Revisiting Bitcoin’s carbon footprint. Joule 2022; 6(3): 498–502.
Corbet S, Yarovaya L. The environmental effects of cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Technology 2020; 1: 149.
Panah PG, Bornapour M, Cui X, et al. Investment opportunities: Hydrogen production or BTC mining? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2022; 47(9): 5733–5744. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.206
Ebrahimi M, Mohseni M, Zahedi R. Investigation of thermal performance and life-cycle assessment of a 3D printed building. Energy and Buildings 2022; 272: 112341. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112341
Mirzavand H, Aslani A, Zahedi R. Environmental impact and damage assessment of the natural gas pipeline: Case study of Iran. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2022; 164: 794–806. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.06.042
Zahedi R, Aslani A. Environmental, economic and social impact of five COP26 policies: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Canada. Energy Science & Engineering 2023; 11(8): 2690–2709. doi: 10.1002/ese3.1481
Tari MK, Faraji AR, Alireza A, Zahedi R. Energy simulation and life cycle assessment of a 3D printable building. Cleaner Materials 2023; 7: 100168. doi: 10.1016/j.clema.2023.100168
Aslani A, Hachem-Vermette C, Zahedi R. Environmental impact assessment and potentials of material efficiency using by-products and waste materials. Construction and Building Materials 2023; 378: 131197. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131197
Helo P, Hao Y. Blockchains in operations and supply chains: A model and reference implementation. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2019; 136: 242–251. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.023
Berentsen A. Aleksander Berentsen recommends “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system” by Satoshi Nakamoto. In: 21st Century Economics. Springer; 2019. pp. 7–8.
Velmurugadass P, Dhanasekaran S, Shasi Anand S, Vasudevan V. Enhancing blockchain security in cloud computing with IoT environment using ECIES and cryptography hash algorithm. Materials Today: Proceedings 2021; 37: 2653–2659. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.519
Venkatesh VG, Kang K, Wang B, et al. System architecture for blockchain based transparency of supply chain social sustainability. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2020; 63: 101896. doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101896
Khattak HA, Tehreem K, Almogrenet A, et al. Dynamic pricing in industrial internet of things: Blockchain application for energy management in smart cities. Journal of Information Security and Applications 2020; 55: 102615. doi: 10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102615
Deirmentzoglou E, Papakyriakopoulos G, Patsakis C. A survey on long-range attacks for proof of stake protocols. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 28712–28725. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2901858
Wang Y, Singgih M, Wang J, et al. Making sense of blockchain technology: How will it transform supply chains? International Journal of Production Economics 2019; 211: 221–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.002
Moosavian SF, Zahedi R, Hajinezhad A. Economic, environmental and social impact of carbon tax for Iran: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Energy Science & Engineering 2021; 10(1): 13–29. doi: 10.1002/ese3.1005
Hayes AS. Cryptocurrency value formation: An empirical study leading to a cost of production model for valuing bitcoin. Telematics and Informatics 2017; 34(7): 1308–1321. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.005
Schinckus C. Proof-of-work based blockchain technology and Anthropocene: An undermined situation? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021; 152: 111682. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111682
Dwivedi YK, Hughes L, Kar AK, et al. Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. International Journal of Information Management 2022; 63: 102456. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456
Manimuthu A, Raja SV, Rejikumar G, Marwaha D. A literature review on Bitcoin: Transformation of crypto currency into a global phenomenon. IEEE Engineering Management Review 2019; 47(1): 28–35. doi: 10.1109/EMR.2019.2901431
Goutte S, Guesmi K, Saadi S. Cryptocurrency mining. In: Cryptofinance and Mechanisms of Exchange. Springer; 2019. pp. 51–67.
Zimba A, Wang Z, Mulenga M. Cryptojacking injection: A paradigm shift to cryptocurrency-based web-centric internet attacks. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 2019; 29(1): 40–59. doi: 10.1080/10919392.2019.1552747
Kristoufek L. Bitcoin and its mining on the equilibrium path. Energy Economics 2020; 85: 104588. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104588
Williams BS. Terahertz quantum-cascade lasers. Nature Photonics 2007; 1(9): 517–525. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2007.166
Krause MJ, Tolaymat T. Quantification of energy and carbon costs for mining cryptocurrencies. Nature Sustainability 2018; 1(11): 711–718. doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0152-7
Giungato P, Rana R, Tarabella A, Tricase C. Current trends in sustainability of bitcoins and related blockchain technology. Sustainability 2017; 9(12): 2214. doi: 10.3390/su9122214
McCook H. An order-of-magnitude estimate of the relative sustainability of the Bitcoin network. A Critical Assessment of the Bitcoin Mining Industry, Gold Production Industry, the Legacy Banking System, and the Production of Physical Currency 2014; 2: 25.
Vranken H. Sustainability of bitcoin and blockchains. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2017; 28: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.011
O’Dwyer KJ, Malone D. Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint. In: Proceedings of the 25th IET Irish Signals & Systems Conference 2014 and 2014 China-Ireland International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies (ISSC 2014/CIICT 2014); 26–27 June 2014; Limerick, Ireland. pp. 280–285.
de Vries A. Renewable energy will not solve bitcoin’s sustainability problem. Joule 2019; 3(4): 893–898. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.02.007
Náñez Alonso SL, Jorge-Vázquez J, Fernández NAE, Forradellas RFR. Cryptocurrency mining from an economic and environmental perspective. Analysis of the most and least sustainable countries. Energies 2021; 14(14): 4254. doi: 10.3390/en14144254
Hauschild MZ. Introduction to LCA methodology. In: Life Cycle Assessment. Springer; 2018. pp. 59–66.
Albertí J, Brodhag C, Fullana-i-Palmer PF. First steps in life cycle assessments of cities with a sustainability perspective: A proposal for goal, function, functional unit, and reference flow. Science of the Total Environment 2019; 646: 1516–1527. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.377
Patouillard L, Bulle C, Querleu C, et al. Critical review and practical recommendations to integrate the spatial dimension into life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 177: 398–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.192
Suh S, Huppes G. Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. Journal of Cleaner Production 2005; 13(7): 687–697. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.04.001
Atzei N, Bartoletti M, Lande S, Zunino R. A formal model of Bitcoin transactions. In: Meiklejohn S, Sako K (editors). Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer; 2018. Volume 10957.
Stoll C, Klaaßen L, Gallersdörfer U. The carbon footprint of bitcoin. Joule 2019; 3(7): 1647–1661. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.012
Martynov O. Sustainability Analysis of Cryptocurrencies Based on Projected Return on Investment and Environmental Impact [Master’s thesis]. Harvard University; 2020.
Qiu Y, Wang Z, Xie T, Zhang X. Forecasting Bitcoin realized volatility by exploiting measurement error under model uncertainty. Journal of Empirical Finance 2021; 62: 179–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.03.003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18282/i-es.v6i1.583
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
